The Law Society’s Conveyancing Quality Scheme (CQS) 2026 training update is available now.

Stay accredited with the trusted training supplier to over 1900 firms. Book now.

Questioning and Challenging the Expert Witness

Expert witnesses are essential to the fair administration of justice, offering clear, accurate and impartial testimony that can shape the outcome of a case. For lawyers, selecting the right expert and understanding how to work with them effectively is critical. Failure in this area can damage your credibility and leave your expert’s evidence open to challenge. 

In this bitesize course, solicitor-advocate Adam Tear navigates you through the key skills needed to confidently handle expert evidence in civil proceedings. You will learn how to establish and challenge witnesses’ credibility during examination-in-chief, discover various techniques for cross-examining expert testimony, and be given a clear overview of the legal grounds on which the use of experts may be contested. The course also explores how to manage conflicting expert opinions and provides insights into the increasingly common practice of concurrent expert evidence, also known as ‘hot-tubbing’. 

Whether you’re building your foundational knowledge or sharpening your advocacy skills, this course will give you the tools to work strategically and effectively with expert witnesses. Enrol now! 

You might also be interested in our other expert witnesses and advocacy courses. 

What this will cover

This course will cover:  

  • the role of expert witnesses in civil law 
  • establishing and challenging a witness’s credibility through examination-in-chief 
  • challenging expert evidence during cross-examination 
  • how to challenge the use of experts 
  • how to manage conflicting expert opinions 
  • how to use concurrent expert evidence (‘hot-tubbing’) 
Learning outcomes

By the end of this course, you will be able to: 

  • explain the role of expert witnesses in civil legal proceedings  
  • utilise key strategies for both challenging and opposing expert testimony and reinforcing the credibility of one’s own expert through effective re-examination  
  • demonstrate familiarity with the key methods for probing expert evidence, the techniques used to challenge biases or inconsistencies, and strategies for exposing weaknesses in methodology or assumptions  
  • identify the grounds for contesting expert evidence and the legal standards required to qualify as an expert witness in civil proceedings in England and Wales  
  • utilise techniques in order to manage opposing expert opinions and identify the methods courts use to resolve expert disagreements  
  • understand the hot-tubbing process, including its benefits and practical strategies for navigating concurrent expert evidence sessions effectively  
How you will learn

Course format 

This online course consists of the following elements: 

  • an interactive course presentation, with a variety of knowledge checks spaced throughout to test understanding of the material as the learner progresses 
  • an end-of-course assessment consisting of 10 questions 

Our courses conform to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1. However, some members may require an alternative version for accessibility purposes. This is available upon request via our contact us form. 

Assessment 

In order to pass the assessment, you must achieve a pass mark of 70%. 

The knowledge checks included in the course presentation are intended to aid your understanding of the content and offer the opportunity to apply your knowledge. They do not form part of the assessment. 

No. of items Discount
11 – 19 15%
20 – 29 20%
30 – 39 25%
40 + 30%
£57.89 ex VAT
Type of training
CPD
Format
Bitesize
Level
Intermediate
Who is this for?
Solicitors
Course length
45 minutes
Assessment type
MCQs (Multiple Choice Questions).
SRA Competence
C3

The experts

Adam Tear

Expert
Facilitator

View expert bio